What buyers are really scoring in a training or capacity building bid
Training is bought for an outcome the buyer cannot observe until long after the invoice, so evaluation concentrates on the things that predict it. Trainer credentials are scored individually and named in the contract, as in consulting: the people are the product. Curriculum design is scored against the buyer's stated competency gap rather than against a catalogue, and bidders who submit an existing course with a changed cover page tend to score badly against one that shows a needs analysis and maps sessions to competencies.
The delivery model has real commercial consequences. A per-participant price behaves differently from a per-cohort price when attendance is uncertain, and buyers increasingly prefer the latter with a minimum and maximum cohort size written in. Venue, catering, travel and participant subsistence may sit with the buyer or the supplier, and the tender should be read for which. Materials in the working language of the participants, accessible formats, and the right for the buyer to reuse the materials afterwards are routine requirements that a bidder pricing only delivery days will have missed.
Capacity building differs from training in one important respect: the point is that the capability remains after the supplier leaves. That is why so many of these contracts are structured around training of trainers, mentoring and institutional handover rather than headcount through a classroom, and why evaluation increasingly asks for evidence beyond attendance and satisfaction -- assessment of learning, application in the workplace, and follow-up at intervals after delivery. Payment tied to those later measures, rather than to the delivery date, is now common enough that bidders should assume it.
This section describes how this category is bought generally, across the public buyers that publish it. The figures elsewhere on this page are measured for this market alone.
Who buys training and capacity building in Uzbekistan?
GlobalGov holds 21 training and capacity building records from 10 distinct buying organisations in Uzbekistan. The most frequent publishers are World Bank -- Uzbekistan Digital Inclusion Project (7 records); World Bank -- Innovative Social Protection System For Inclusion Of Vulnerable People Project (4 records); World Bank -- Electricity Sector Transformation And Resilient Transmission (3 records); World Bank -- Institutional Capacity Building Project (1 record); World Bank -- Modernizing Uzbekistan National Innovation System Project (1 record); World Bank -- Promoting Early Childhood Development Project (1 record). Between them the 6 largest account for 81% of everything published, so buying here is concentrated in a few authorities.
| Buying organisation | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| World Bank -- Uzbekistan Digital Inclusion Project | 7 | 33% |
| World Bank -- Innovative Social Protection System For Inclusion Of Vulnerable People Project | 4 | 19% |
| World Bank -- Electricity Sector Transformation And Resilient Transmission | 3 | 14% |
| World Bank -- Institutional Capacity Building Project | 1 | 4.8% |
| World Bank -- Modernizing Uzbekistan National Innovation System Project | 1 | 4.8% |
| World Bank -- Promoting Early Childhood Development Project | 1 | 4.8% |
How long do bidders get to respond to training and capacity building tenders in Uzbekistan?
Across the 17 Uzbekistan training and capacity building notices that publish both a publication date and a closing date, the median response window is 13 days. A quarter of them allowed 11 days or fewer and a quarter stayed open for more than 16. 9 of them (53%) closed within a fortnight of being published, so on this market a bidder who reviews notices once a week can lose most of the response window before reading one.
How often are training and capacity building tenders published in Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan published 6 notices in this category in the last twelve months. Over the last three years there were 19, spread across 13 separate months of activity since 24 May 2019. May is historically the busiest month. No new notice has been published in this category since 22 December 2025, 283 days ago, so treat the figures above as a record of the market rather than as this week's pipeline.
How does Uzbekistan compare with other training and capacity building markets?
Among the 40 countries where GlobalGov holds a comparable training and capacity building market, Uzbekistan ranks 40th by number of records. The largest is France (3,834 records against 21 here). Within Uzbekistan itself, training and capacity building is the 4th largest of the 5 procurement categories tracked here.
Where do the Uzbekistan training and capacity building records on this page come from?
These 21 records are collected from 1 official source: the World Bank (21). GlobalGov is an independent aggregator and is not affiliated with any of them; each record links back to the notice on its issuing portal. The set is rebuilt nightly, and the counts on this page were taken on 2026-10-01.
Most recent Training and Capacity Building tenders in Uzbekistan
None of these are open for bids now — they are the most recent records GlobalGov holds for this market, kept here so the shape of a typical training and capacity building notice in Uzbekistan is visible. Set an alert to be told when the next one opens.
Other procurement categories in Uzbekistan
Training and Capacity Building procurement in other markets
Never Miss a Uzbekistan Government Contract
Finding Uzbekistan tenders usually means a local portal, a local registration and someone who reads the language. Get an alert you can read when a new training and capacity building opportunity is published there.
Start Free Trial