Independence, evaluation design and the data a verifier is expected to produce
Monitoring and evaluation is commissioned precisely because the buyer cannot mark its own work, so independence is a structural requirement rather than a preference. Firms that designed or delivered the programme being evaluated are normally excluded, the declaration covers affiliates and named individuals, and the contract usually protects the evaluator's right to report findings the commissioner does not want. A tender that lacks that protection is worth reading twice before bidding.
The technical bid is an evaluation design, and it is judged on whether the design can actually support the claims the commissioner wants to make. Bidders set out the questions, the counterfactual or comparison strategy, sampling, instruments, analysis and the limits of what attribution the design permits. Baseline availability usually determines what is possible: where no baseline was collected, an honest bid says which questions become unanswerable rather than promising a retrospective one.
Third-party monitoring and verification is a distinct sub-market with different requirements. Here the supplier is confirming that reported activity actually happened -- deliveries made, works built, people trained -- often in places the commissioner cannot safely visit. That needs field teams, sampling protocols that resist manipulation, geotagged and timestamped evidence, and a chain of custody for data that would survive challenge. Security, access negotiation and duty of care for field staff are priced obligations, and the reporting cycle is usually frequent and fixed.
This section describes how this category is bought generally, across the public buyers that publish it. The figures elsewhere on this page are measured for this market alone.
Who buys monitoring evaluation in Uzbekistan?
GlobalGov holds 27 monitoring evaluation records from 13 distinct buying organisations in Uzbekistan. The most frequent publishers are World Bank -- Clean Energy For Buildings In Uzbekistan (12 records); World Bank -- Ferghana Valley Water Resources Management - Phase II (2 records); World Bank -- Innovative Social Protection System For Inclusion Of Vulnerable People Project (2 records); World Bank -- Uzbekistan Education System Capacity Building (scb) Project (2 records); Undp (1 record); World Bank -- Access To Finance For Jobs And Growth MPA Phase 1 - Uzbekistan (1 record). Between them the 6 largest account for 74% of everything published, so buying here is concentrated in a few authorities.
| Buying organisation | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| World Bank -- Clean Energy For Buildings In Uzbekistan | 12 | 44% |
| World Bank -- Ferghana Valley Water Resources Management - Phase II | 2 | 7.4% |
| World Bank -- Innovative Social Protection System For Inclusion Of Vulnerable People Project | 2 | 7.4% |
| World Bank -- Uzbekistan Education System Capacity Building (scb) Project | 2 | 7.4% |
| Undp | 1 | 3.7% |
| World Bank -- Access To Finance For Jobs And Growth MPA Phase 1 - Uzbekistan | 1 | 3.7% |
How long do bidders get to respond to monitoring evaluation tenders in Uzbekistan?
Across the 24 Uzbekistan monitoring evaluation notices that publish both a publication date and a closing date, the median response window is 12 days. A quarter of them allowed 8 days or fewer and a quarter stayed open for more than 14. 15 of them (62%) closed within a fortnight of being published, so on this market a bidder who reviews notices once a week can lose most of the response window before reading one.
How often are monitoring evaluation tenders published in Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan published 20 notices in this category in the last twelve months. Over the last three years there were 27, spread across 11 separate months of activity since 3 October 2024. January is historically the busiest month. No new notice has been published in this category since 20 May 2026, 134 days ago, so treat the figures above as a record of the market rather than as this week's pipeline.
How does Uzbekistan compare with other monitoring evaluation markets?
Among the 23 countries where GlobalGov holds a comparable monitoring evaluation market, Uzbekistan ranks 19th by number of records. The largest is Colombia (1,681 records against 27 here). Within Uzbekistan itself, monitoring evaluation is the 2nd largest of the 5 procurement categories tracked here.
Where do the Uzbekistan monitoring evaluation records on this page come from?
These 27 records are collected from 2 official sources: the World Bank (26), UN Global Marketplace (1). GlobalGov is an independent aggregator and is not affiliated with any of them; each record links back to the notice on its issuing portal. The set is rebuilt nightly, and the counts on this page were taken on 2026-10-01.
Most recent Monitoring Evaluation tenders in Uzbekistan
None of these are open for bids now — they are the most recent records GlobalGov holds for this market, kept here so the shape of a typical monitoring evaluation notice in Uzbekistan is visible. Set an alert to be told when the next one opens.
Other procurement categories in Uzbekistan
Monitoring Evaluation procurement in other markets
Never Miss a Uzbekistan Government Contract
Finding Uzbekistan tenders usually means a local portal, a local registration and someone who reads the language. Get an alert you can read when a new monitoring evaluation opportunity is published there.
Start Free Trial