Independence, evaluation design and the data a verifier is expected to produce
Monitoring and evaluation is commissioned precisely because the buyer cannot mark its own work, so independence is a structural requirement rather than a preference. Firms that designed or delivered the programme being evaluated are normally excluded, the declaration covers affiliates and named individuals, and the contract usually protects the evaluator's right to report findings the commissioner does not want. A tender that lacks that protection is worth reading twice before bidding.
The technical bid is an evaluation design, and it is judged on whether the design can actually support the claims the commissioner wants to make. Bidders set out the questions, the counterfactual or comparison strategy, sampling, instruments, analysis and the limits of what attribution the design permits. Baseline availability usually determines what is possible: where no baseline was collected, an honest bid says which questions become unanswerable rather than promising a retrospective one.
Third-party monitoring and verification is a distinct sub-market with different requirements. Here the supplier is confirming that reported activity actually happened -- deliveries made, works built, people trained -- often in places the commissioner cannot safely visit. That needs field teams, sampling protocols that resist manipulation, geotagged and timestamped evidence, and a chain of custody for data that would survive challenge. Security, access negotiation and duty of care for field staff are priced obligations, and the reporting cycle is usually frequent and fixed.
This section describes how this category is bought generally, across the public buyers that publish it. The figures elsewhere on this page are measured for this market alone.
Who buys monitoring evaluation in Indonesia?
GlobalGov holds 111 monitoring evaluation records from 46 distinct buying organisations in Indonesia. The most frequent publishers are Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur (14 records); Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (13 records); Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Bekasi (12 records); Kementerian Energi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral (7 records); Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat (5 records); Kementerian Komunikasi Dan Informatika (4 records). Between them the 6 largest account for 50% of everything published, so buying here is spread across many separate authorities.
| Buying organisation | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur | 14 | 13% |
| Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia | 13 | 12% |
| Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Bekasi | 12 | 11% |
| Kementerian Energi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral | 7 | 6.3% |
| Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat | 5 | 4.5% |
| Kementerian Komunikasi Dan Informatika | 4 | 3.6% |
How long do bidders get to respond to monitoring evaluation tenders in Indonesia?
Across the 8 Indonesia monitoring evaluation notices that publish both a publication date and a closing date, the median response window is 16 days. A quarter of them allowed 14 days or fewer and a quarter stayed open for more than 20. 2 of them (25%) closed within a fortnight of being published, so on this market a bidder who reviews notices once a week can lose most of the response window before reading one.
How often are monitoring evaluation tenders published in Indonesia?
Indonesia published 10 notices in this category in the last twelve months. Over the last three years there were 15, spread across 47 separate months of activity since 14 April 2014. April is historically the busiest month. No new notice has been published in this category since 18 May 2026, 136 days ago, so treat the figures above as a record of the market rather than as this week's pipeline.
How does Indonesia compare with other monitoring evaluation markets?
Among the 23 countries where GlobalGov holds a comparable monitoring evaluation market, Indonesia ranks 7th by number of records. The largest is Colombia (1,681 records against 111 here).
Where do the Indonesia monitoring evaluation records on this page come from?
These 111 records are collected from 3 official sources: LKPP (95), the World Bank (11), UN Global Marketplace (5). GlobalGov is an independent aggregator and is not affiliated with any of them; each record links back to the notice on its issuing portal. The set is rebuilt nightly, and the counts on this page were taken on 2026-10-01.
Most recent Monitoring Evaluation tenders in Indonesia
None of these are open for bids now — they are the most recent records GlobalGov holds for this market, kept here so the shape of a typical monitoring evaluation notice in Indonesia is visible. Set an alert to be told when the next one opens.
Survey and Assessment of Working Conditions in Smallholder Coffee Farming and Coffee Collecting Joint Business Groups (KUB) During Harvest Season in Tanggamus and West Lampung Districts, Lampung Province, Indonesia_VZF_RFQ (Request for Quotation)
Design and conduct a mixed-method evaluation of the Family Hope Programme [PKH], a conditional cash transfer initiative of the Government of Indonesia.
Request for Quotation: Assessment of the Implementation of the Indonesia–Malaysia Memorandum of Understanding on the Placement and Protection of Indonesian Domestic Workers
Child Environmental Health Assessment (CEHA) in Indonesia # Building on the Climate Landscape Analysis for Children (CLAC) Framework
Other procurement categories in Indonesia
Monitoring Evaluation procurement in other markets
Never Miss a Indonesia Government Contract
Finding Indonesia tenders usually means a local portal, a local registration and someone who reads the language. Get an alert you can read when a new monitoring evaluation opportunity is published there.
Start Free Trial