Independence, evaluation design and the data a verifier is expected to produce
Monitoring and evaluation is commissioned precisely because the buyer cannot mark its own work, so independence is a structural requirement rather than a preference. Firms that designed or delivered the programme being evaluated are normally excluded, the declaration covers affiliates and named individuals, and the contract usually protects the evaluator's right to report findings the commissioner does not want. A tender that lacks that protection is worth reading twice before bidding.
The technical bid is an evaluation design, and it is judged on whether the design can actually support the claims the commissioner wants to make. Bidders set out the questions, the counterfactual or comparison strategy, sampling, instruments, analysis and the limits of what attribution the design permits. Baseline availability usually determines what is possible: where no baseline was collected, an honest bid says which questions become unanswerable rather than promising a retrospective one.
Third-party monitoring and verification is a distinct sub-market with different requirements. Here the supplier is confirming that reported activity actually happened -- deliveries made, works built, people trained -- often in places the commissioner cannot safely visit. That needs field teams, sampling protocols that resist manipulation, geotagged and timestamped evidence, and a chain of custody for data that would survive challenge. Security, access negotiation and duty of care for field staff are priced obligations, and the reporting cycle is usually frequent and fixed.
This section describes how this category is bought generally, across the public buyers that publish it. The figures elsewhere on this page are measured for this market alone.
Who buys monitoring evaluation in Slovenia?
GlobalGov holds 63 monitoring evaluation records from 43 distinct buying organisations in Slovenia. The most frequent publishers are SB Nova Gorica (4 records); Ursvs (4 records); Družba Za Avtoceste V Republiki Sloveniji D.d. (3 records); Mestna Občina Maribor (3 records); Dars D.d. (2 records); Družba Za Avtoceste V Republiki Sloveniji D.d. (2 records). Between them the 6 largest account for 29% of everything published, so buying here is spread across many separate authorities.
| Buying organisation | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| SB Nova Gorica | 4 | 6.3% |
| Ursvs | 4 | 6.3% |
| Družba Za Avtoceste V Republiki Sloveniji D.d. | 3 | 4.8% |
| Mestna Občina Maribor | 3 | 4.8% |
| Dars D.d. | 2 | 3.2% |
| Družba Za Avtoceste V Republiki Sloveniji D.d. | 2 | 3.2% |
How long do bidders get to respond to monitoring evaluation tenders in Slovenia?
Across the 35 Slovenia monitoring evaluation notices that publish both a publication date and a closing date, the median response window is 21 days. A quarter of them allowed 13 days or fewer and a quarter stayed open for more than 33. 10 of them (29%) closed within a fortnight of being published, so on this market a bidder who reviews notices once a week can lose most of the response window before reading one.
How often are monitoring evaluation tenders published in Slovenia?
Slovenia published 7 notices in this category in the last twelve months. Over the last three years there were 7, spread across 49 separate months of activity since 31 July 2008. May is historically the busiest month. No new notice has been published in this category since 26 May 2026, 128 days ago, so treat the figures above as a record of the market rather than as this week's pipeline.
How does Slovenia compare with other monitoring evaluation markets?
Among the 23 countries where GlobalGov holds a comparable monitoring evaluation market, Slovenia ranks 12th by number of records. The largest is Colombia (1,681 records against 63 here). Within Slovenia itself, monitoring evaluation is the 23rd largest of the 28 procurement categories tracked here.
Where do the Slovenia monitoring evaluation records on this page come from?
These 63 records are collected from 2 official sources: the Slovenia national tender archive (56), TED (7). GlobalGov is an independent aggregator and is not affiliated with any of them; each record links back to the notice on its issuing portal. The set is rebuilt nightly, and the counts on this page were taken on 2026-10-01.
Most recent Monitoring Evaluation tenders in Slovenia
None of these are open for bids now — they are the most recent records GlobalGov holds for this market, kept here so the shape of a typical monitoring evaluation notice in Slovenia is visible. Set an alert to be told when the next one opens.
Other procurement categories in Slovenia
Medical EquipmentVehicles and FleetFood Aid and NutritionSoftware DevelopmentVehicle MaintenanceWaste ManagementLaboratory EquipmentIct EquipmentManagement ConsultingFuel SupplyBuilding ConstructionOffice FurnitureHospital ConstructionRoads and Highways InfrastructureFacilities and CleaningUniforms ClothingPharmaceuticalsMilitary LogisticsFreight and LogisticsMaintenance & RepairRoad & InfrastructureEnergyPower TransmissionResearch & DevelopmentRenovation RehabilitationCommunications PrSecurity Services
Monitoring Evaluation procurement in other markets
Never Miss a Slovenia Government Contract
Finding Slovenia tenders usually means a local portal, a local registration and someone who reads the language. Get an alert you can read when a new monitoring evaluation opportunity is published there.
Start Free Trial