Licensing rounds, service contracts and local content obligations
Notices in this category cover two quite different things. One is access to acreage: licensing or bid rounds in which a state offers exploration and production rights and evaluates work programme commitments, financial capacity and fiscal terms rather than a price for services. The other is the service market that follows -- drilling, seismic, well services, engineering, fabrication, inspection and maintenance -- bought by national oil companies and operators under conventional contracts. The qualification routes for the two have almost nothing in common.
Service contracts in upstream work are dominated by day rates and standby rates, because the cost of an idle rig or vessel is the thing both parties are managing. Mobilisation and demobilisation are priced separately, weather and waiting-on-operations risk is allocated explicitly, and the contract usually carries a knock-for-knock liability regime in which each party bears its own people and property loss regardless of fault. That regime is standard in the industry and surprising to bidders arriving from other sectors.
Two requirement sets tend to decide who can compete. Safety and environmental management is assessed as a system -- permit to work, well control certification, emergency response, spill preparedness, and an auditable incident record -- and a weak record excludes a bidder before commercial evaluation. Local content obligations are the second: many producing states require defined proportions of local employment, local sourcing, training and often local ownership, evidenced in the bid and audited during the contract, which makes a credible in-country partner a practical condition of entry rather than a commercial choice.
This section describes how this category is bought generally, across the public buyers that publish it. The figures elsewhere on this page are measured for this market alone.
Who buys oil gas upstream in Finland?
GlobalGov holds 71 oil gas upstream records from 41 distinct buying organisations in Finland. The most frequent publishers are Hansel Oy (5 records); Pohjois-Karjalan hankintatoimi (4 records); Porin Linjat Oy (4 records); Sansia Oy (4 records); Ylöjärven kaupunki (3 records); FinnHEMS Lentopalvelut Oy (2 records). Between them the 6 largest account for 31% of everything published, so buying here is spread across many separate authorities.
| Buying organisation | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Hansel Oy | 5 | 7.0% |
| Pohjois-Karjalan hankintatoimi | 4 | 5.6% |
| Porin Linjat Oy | 4 | 5.6% |
| Sansia Oy | 4 | 5.6% |
| Ylöjärven kaupunki | 3 | 4.2% |
| FinnHEMS Lentopalvelut Oy | 2 | 2.8% |
What are oil gas upstream contracts worth in Finland?
35 of the 71 records publish a contract value. The median is $1.6M and the largest single published value is $77.8M. By size, 12 between $100k and $1M, 19 between $1M and $10M, 4 above $10M. The remaining 36 publish no value at all, so every figure here describes the priced subset only, and values are as stated by the buyer rather than as finally awarded.
| Contract size | Records | Share of priced |
|---|---|---|
| under $100k | 0 | 0.0% |
| between $100k and $1M | 12 | 34% |
| between $1M and $10M | 19 | 54% |
| above $10M | 4 | 11% |
How long do bidders get to respond to oil gas upstream tenders in Finland?
Across the 6 Finland oil gas upstream notices that publish both a publication date and a closing date, the median response window is 32 days. A quarter of them allowed 20 days or fewer and a quarter stayed open for more than 35. Short turnarounds are the exception rather than the rule here: only 1 (17%) closed within a fortnight of being published.
How often are oil gas upstream tenders published in Finland?
Finland published 15 notices in this category in the last twelve months. Over the last three years there were 27, spread across 34 separate months of activity since 5 July 2021. May is historically the busiest month. No new notice has been published in this category since 26 May 2026, 128 days ago, so treat the figures above as a record of the market rather than as this week's pipeline.
How does Finland compare with other oil gas upstream markets?
Among the 27 countries where GlobalGov holds a comparable oil gas upstream market, Finland ranks 21st by number of records. The largest is Poland (2,222 records against 71 here). Within Finland itself, oil gas upstream is the 39th largest of the 45 procurement categories tracked here.
Where do the Finland oil gas upstream records on this page come from?
These 71 records are collected from 1 official source: TED (71). GlobalGov is an independent aggregator and is not affiliated with any of them; each record links back to the notice on its issuing portal. The set is rebuilt nightly, and the counts on this page were taken on 2026-10-01.
Most recent Oil Gas Upstream tenders in Finland
None of these are open for bids now — they are the most recent records GlobalGov holds for this market, kept here so the shape of a typical oil gas upstream notice in Finland is visible. Set an alert to be told when the next one opens.
Finland-Siilinjärvi: Fuels
Finland-Helsinki: Gaseous fuels
Other procurement categories in Finland
Oil Gas Upstream procurement in other markets
Never Miss a Finland Government Contract
Finding Finland tenders usually means a local portal, a local registration and someone who reads the language. Get an alert you can read when a new oil gas upstream opportunity is published there.
Start Free Trial