Why these contracts are priced as rates rather than as a job
Maintenance is bought without knowing what will break. That single fact shapes the whole category: instead of a price for a defined scope, bidders price a schedule of rates -- a published list of individual operations, each with a unit and a rate -- and work is instructed, measured and paid against that list for the life of the contract. There is usually no guaranteed volume. A supplier that wins on rates and then receives a fraction of the expected instructions has won exactly what the contract promised, and bidders who model fixed overhead against hoped-for turnover are the ones who fail mid-term.
The specification splits into planned and reactive work, and they are scored differently. Planned preventive maintenance is a schedule against an asset register: known frequencies, known tasks, statutory inspections that must happen whether anything is wrong or not. Reactive work is governed by priority categories with an attendance time and a rectification time attached to each, and performance against those times is the measure the contract actually manages. Bidders should read the priority matrix before the task list, because it determines the standby cover the price has to carry.
Two obligations are easy to miss and expensive to retrofit. The first is data: buyers increasingly require every job to be raised, updated and closed in their own asset management system, with asset condition and remaining life fed back, so the supplier is maintaining the record as well as the asset. The second is statutory compliance evidence -- certificates for pressure systems, lifting equipment, electrical installations, fire safety and water hygiene -- which the buyer must be able to produce to a regulator on demand and which therefore becomes a contractual deliverable with dates attached.
This section describes how this category is bought generally, across the public buyers that publish it. The figures elsewhere on this page are measured for this market alone.
Who buys maintenance & repair in Denmark?
GlobalGov holds 44 maintenance & repair records from 40 distinct buying organisations in Denmark. The most frequent publishers are Banedanmark (2 records); Tønder Kommune (2 records); ARGO I/S - KVV Vedligehold (1 record); Aalborg Forsyning (1 record); Aalborg Kommune (1 record); Afatek A/S (1 record). Between them the 6 largest account for 18% of everything published, so buying here is spread across many separate authorities.
| Buying organisation | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Banedanmark | 2 | 4.5% |
| Tønder Kommune | 2 | 4.5% |
| ARGO I/S - KVV Vedligehold | 1 | 2.3% |
| Aalborg Forsyning | 1 | 2.3% |
| Aalborg Kommune | 1 | 2.3% |
| Afatek A/S | 1 | 2.3% |
What are maintenance & repair contracts worth in Denmark?
31 of the 44 records publish a contract value. The median is $1.7M and the largest single published value is $524.9M. By size, 1 under $100k, 9 between $100k and $1M, 15 between $1M and $10M, 6 above $10M. The remaining 13 publish no value at all, so every figure here describes the priced subset only, and values are as stated by the buyer rather than as finally awarded.
| Contract size | Records | Share of priced |
|---|---|---|
| under $100k | 1 | 3.2% |
| between $100k and $1M | 9 | 29% |
| between $1M and $10M | 15 | 48% |
| above $10M | 6 | 19% |
How long do bidders get to respond to maintenance & repair tenders in Denmark?
Across the 14 Denmark maintenance & repair notices that publish both a publication date and a closing date, the median response window is 29 days. A quarter of them allowed 24 days or fewer and a quarter stayed open for more than 33. Not one of them closed within a fortnight of being published, so the window on this market is consistently workable.
How often are maintenance & repair tenders published in Denmark?
Denmark published 16 notices in this category in the last twelve months. Over the last three years there were 17, spread across 22 separate months of activity since 2 July 2016. August is historically the busiest month. The most recent was published 8 September 2026.
How does Denmark compare with other maintenance & repair markets?
Among the 40 countries where GlobalGov holds a comparable maintenance & repair market, Denmark ranks 36th by number of records. The largest is Australia (35,937 records against 44 here). Within Denmark itself, maintenance & repair is the 32nd largest of the 43 procurement categories tracked here.
Where do the Denmark maintenance & repair records on this page come from?
These 44 records are collected from 2 official sources: TED (43), the Sweden TED feed (1). GlobalGov is an independent aggregator and is not affiliated with any of them; each record links back to the notice on its issuing portal. The set is rebuilt nightly, and the counts on this page were taken on 2026-10-01.
Open Maintenance & Repair tenders in Denmark
Showing 6 of the 6 notices open in this category today. Openness uses the same definition as the Denmark market page: active, not marked awarded, cancelled, closed or expired, and either closing in the future or published within the last 90 days with no stated closing date.
Denmark – Ornamental and pleasure gardens maintenance services – TED Grøn DIS vedr. Langgade nærgenbrugsstation
Denmark – Repair and maintenance services – Fraflytningsydelser - AlmenIndkøb
Denmark – Repair and maintenance services of playground equipment – Udbud på indkøb af service til institutionskøretøjer til Jysk Fællesindkøb
Denmark – Street-lighting maintenance services – Udbud af drift og vedligeholdelse af vejbelysning og sportsbelysning
Denmark – Miscellaneous repair and maintenance services – Service og vedligehold - Smedearbejde
Other procurement categories in Denmark
Maintenance & Repair procurement in other markets
Never Miss a Denmark Government Contract
Finding Denmark tenders usually means a local portal, a local registration and someone who reads the language. Get an alert you can read when a new maintenance & repair opportunity is published there.
Start Free Trial