Connectivity contracts, service levels and the cost of moving supplier
Telecommunications is bought as a service with an engineering tail. The specification names sites, bandwidths, resilience levels and the technology where it matters, but the terms that decide the contract are the service levels: availability expressed as a percentage of the year, time to respond and time to restore by fault severity, planned maintenance windows, and service credits that apply automatically rather than on request. Buyers with operationally critical sites specify diverse routing and separate points of entry, which is a physical requirement a bidder must survey rather than assert.
The commercial shape is a term contract with installation and recurring charges separated, and the installation side carries most of the delivery risk. Wayleaves and access agreements with landowners, civil works to bring a duct to a building, and third-party network lead times sit largely outside the supplier's control, so tenders normally require a site-by-site delivery plan rather than a blanket lead time. A bid that quotes a standard installation period across a portfolio of sites has not surveyed them.
Migration is the hidden cost and the most common reason a buyer stays with an incumbent it is unhappy with. Moving a connected estate involves parallel running, number and address portability, reconfiguration at each site and a cutover per location, and the tender should state who pays for it. Increasingly buyers also specify supply chain security assurance, lawful interception obligations, data residency for traffic and metadata, and end-of-contract obligations that allow the next supplier to take over without the estate being rebuilt again.
This section describes how this category is bought generally, across the public buyers that publish it. The figures elsewhere on this page are measured for this market alone.
Who buys telecommunications in United States?
GlobalGov holds 6,964 telecommunications records from 400 distinct buying organisations in United States. The most frequent publishers are DLA Land and Maritime (2,084 records); DLA Land and Maritime (1,475 records); DLA Aviation (451 records); DLA Aviation (336 records); NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support MECH (257 records); Navsup Weapon Systems Support Mech (200 records). Between them the 6 largest account for 69% of everything published, so buying here is concentrated in a few authorities.
| Buying organisation | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| DLA Land and Maritime | 2,084 | 30% |
| DLA Land and Maritime | 1,475 | 21% |
| DLA Aviation | 451 | 6.5% |
| DLA Aviation | 336 | 4.8% |
| NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support MECH | 257 | 3.7% |
| Navsup Weapon Systems Support Mech | 200 | 2.9% |
What are telecommunications contracts worth in United States?
900 of the 6,964 records publish a contract value. The median is $156,454 and the largest single published value is $1.5B. By size, 403 under $100k, 452 between $100k and $1M, 24 between $1M and $10M, 21 above $10M. The remaining 6,064 publish no value at all, so every figure here describes the priced subset only, and values are as stated by the buyer rather than as finally awarded.
| Contract size | Records | Share of priced |
|---|---|---|
| under $100k | 403 | 45% |
| between $100k and $1M | 452 | 50% |
| between $1M and $10M | 24 | 2.7% |
| above $10M | 21 | 2.3% |
How long do bidders get to respond to telecommunications tenders in United States?
Across the 6,737 United States telecommunications notices that publish both a publication date and a closing date, the median response window is 15 days. A quarter of them allowed 11 days or fewer and a quarter stayed open for more than 15. 3,079 of them (46%) closed within a fortnight of being published, so on this market a bidder who reviews notices once a week can lose most of the response window before reading one.
How often are telecommunications tenders published in United States?
United States publishes about 555 notices a month in this category, 6,657 in the last twelve months. That is 2872% more than the 224 published in the twelve months before that. Over the last three years there were 6,892, spread across 66 separate months of activity since 25 March 2016. April is historically the busiest month. The most recent was published 30 September 2026.
How does United States compare with other telecommunications markets?
Among the 29 countries where GlobalGov holds a comparable telecommunications market, United States ranks 1st by number of records. No other country in the corpus publishes more of it. Within United States itself, telecommunications is the 6th largest of the 85 procurement categories tracked here.
Where do the United States telecommunications records on this page come from?
These 6,964 records are collected from 2 official sources: SAM.gov (6,955), USAspending (9). GlobalGov is an independent aggregator and is not affiliated with any of them; each record links back to the notice on its issuing portal. The set is rebuilt nightly, and the counts on this page were taken on 2026-10-01.
Most recent Telecommunications tenders in United States
None of these are open for bids now — they are the most recent records GlobalGov holds for this market, kept here so the shape of a typical telecommunications notice in United States is visible. Set an alert to be told when the next one opens.
N0038324PR0R033
MP19 V1 Control and Indicator Unit (CUI)
N0038326PR0R564_FMS
N0038326PR0R452_FMS
Pattern Generator Kits
NRP,SYNTHESIZER ASS_FMS Repair
N0038325PR0R854_FMS
N0038326PR0R128_FMS
Camera Operator Workstations
Other procurement categories in United States
Telecommunications procurement in other markets
Never Miss a United States Government Contract
Finding United States tenders usually means a local portal, a local registration and someone who reads the language. Get an alert you can read when a new telecommunications opportunity is published there.
Start Free Trial